Meeting notice: The 02.Oct.02 meeting will be held at 7:30 p.m. at the Royal East (782 Main St., Cambridge), a block down from the corner of Main St. and Mass Ave. If you're new and can't recognize us, ask the manager. He'll probably know where we are. More details below. <-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-> Suggested topic: NanoSpam There is a body of thought that holds that nanotechnology will eradicate commercial culture as we know it. Perhaps it will. However it is worth reflecting on the chance that it might not, if only because there will almost certainly be a transition during which NT and media-driven capitalism will overlap. This suggests that for at least for a few years advertising agencies may be able to advance their client's interests using replicators and assemblers. What will that look like? Sound like? Feel like? One imagines the cycle beginning with nano touts projecting their "messages" directly onto the retina or into the cortex. One's first impulse is to think that so intimate an assault would never be legal, but the example of email spam suggests that the case is not so simple. Ad replicators would blow across jurisdictional borders, evolve to escape embedded controls, and hang around for years. Presumably evolutionary feedback would be incorporated via directly coupling to POS systems, so that those agents that were responsible for more sales replicated faster than those that did not. One can imagine life in the NT era as being a maddening and continuous babble of ads, like a commercial tinnitus. On the other hand, given appropriate levels of competition, these nano agents will almost certainly start to be programmed to find and kill competing agents -- or they will evolve in that direction anyway, since competing agents cut down on sales. (The architecture of the internet unfortunately prevents the development of predator spam; if this were permitted the problem might be easier to deal with.) This might begin to be a solution. On the other hand, the competing ad replicators might possibly evolve a joint management strategy to harvest our mindshare cooperatively, or they might enter into a serious arm's race, ending Lord knows where. Both alternatives are worth exploring in more detail. <-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-> In twenty years half the population of Europe will have visited the moon. -- Jules Verne, 1865 <-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-> Announcement Archive: http://www.pobox.com/~fhapgood/nsgpage.html. <-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-> Legend: "NSG" expands to Nanotechnology Study Group. The Group meets on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at the above address, which refers to a restaurant located in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The NSG mailing list carries announcements of these meetings and little else. If you wish to subscribe to this list (perhaps having received a sample via a forward) send the string 'subscribe nsg' to majordomo@world.std.com. Unsubs follow the same model. Discussion should be sent to nsg- d@world.std.com, which must be subscribed to separately. You must be subscribed to nsg-d to post to it and must post from the address from which you subscribed (An anti- spam thing). Comments, petitions, and suggestions re list management to: nsg@pobox.com.